IPL 2011 – 4 Indians / 3 Foreigners to be retained: RCB and KKR

Inspired by this post (here) from the Daredevilblogger.

As many of you know, Delhi Daredevils is my third team. And I tend to agree with Daredevilblogger’s selection, apart from Gambhir. Gambhir must stay. However, my team, Royal Challengers Bangalore, and my second team Kolkata Knight Riders, are ripe for the picking, as they say 🙂

Before trying this I would just like to add a caveat. The problem with retaining a long-in-the-tooth big name is not there with Delhi, as during the days of the Fab-5, Delhi did not have a major representation in the national team. Probably the oldest iconic player (as opposed to an icon player) for Delhi is Sehwag, who still has at least 5 to 6 more IPLs in him. However with both RCB and KKR, there is this problem with these iconic players, namely Anil Kumble, Rahul Dravid and Sourav Ganguly. And I will explain.
We all know and understand that Ganguly and Kumble have probably one more IPL outing in them, and Dravid probably two. However, Warne is, in all probability, not coming back. And that means there are three teams, namely Kochi, Pune and Rajasthan, who are in the need of a big name to lead them and provide credibility to their IPL effort, the way Warne did it for RR for such a long while. Even a par performance in the IPL requires a strong captain.
After all, what stops Kochi to bid for Kumble (remember, his ancestral village is in the Karnataka-Kerala border); or for Pune (whose owner is Bong, and friendly to Ganguly), to bid for Ganguly as player-coach? Or even for Dravid, who is, after all, of Maharashtrian origin. Both Ganguly and Dravid have reasonable acceptability in Pune and Maharashtra in general, neither scenario would be a potential disaster like, say, Yuvraj leading Kochi.
It’s an important caveat to remember.

Let me try RCB first:

The advantage with RCB is that the core of this team is excellent. However, as important as getting new players should be giving chances to the new breed, guys like Abhimanyu Mithun, Ganesh Sathish and Amit Verma, all of whom had performed creditably at the Ranji trophy, and can emulate Pandey.

Foreign Slots: The three foreign players retained should be

Jacques Kallis – Did you see Eoin Morgan bat? An absolute delight and a sensation! And young. Morgan can change the way the game is played, and if you have someone like him, you keep him. Yes, even over Jacques Kallis. ………. eh? Isn’t there a mistake here? No, that’s exactly how I wanted it to be. The only reason Morgan should be put on the shop window, is that there will be crazy bidding if Morgan is put on the shop window, but there will be absolute carnage if Kallis is put there. And Dr. M is a businessman, he will know how to save a few bucks.

Ross Taylor – The first honorary Bangalorean amongst the foreign recruits, you should hear the roar at the Chinnaswami when Taylor comes in to bat. And there’s also the minor detail of him being, potentially, the best T20 player in the world.

Dale Steyn – Well, if you have the world’s premier fast bowler to keep or get rid from your team, you know which of those two to choose, correct?

(As for the bidding –
Firstly, as mentioned earlier, Dr. M should show the world the strength of his pelf, and get Morgan back in the team.
RCB should re-bid for Roelof Van Der Merwe and Jesse Ryder; Also re-bid for Cameron White; and ignore KP.
A backup to Steyn, maybe Ryan Sidebottom? Darren Sammy? Ian Butler? Juan Theron?)

Indian Slots: The four Indian players retained should be

Rahul Dravid – Yes. Local boy, sensational cricketer and has two more years left in him, maybe three.

Robin Uthappa and Virat Kohli – are sensational young players, who will serve the BRC team for years and years to come. If the choice is available, you would never put either on the shop window.

Manish Pandey – Here’s my talentwatch. And he is a Bangalore boy. However, choosing between him and Vinay Kumar was difficult. And Dr. M and his bid managers would need to take a call here. Both RVK and Pandey need to be retained… now for whom would the bidding war be more rabid? Take a call, and put the other person on the shop window.

(Bidding –
Retaining Kumble is a priority. He is the captain, he has one season left in him, and the team works best with him at the helm. And the only reason that Kumble, and not Dravid should be put on the shop window, is that it is obvious that Kumble has only one year left in him, and other teams might hesitate in getting a player for only one year. Dravid should last longer, and might be the icon for, say, Rajasthan or Pune.
Get another spinner who can be a long term prospect… is KP Appanna good enough? I believe Bangalore should bet the house on Ravindra Jadeja.
Ensure Vinay Kumar is retained. Get a middle order jack-of-all-trades sort like Rajat Bhatia or Laxmi Rattan Shukla.
Either of Amit Mishra and Gautam Gambhir, and either of Ambati Rayudu and Saurabh Tiwary will be made available. That’s up for grabs)

What would happen:
Kallis. Steyn. Taylor. Uthappa. Kohli. Dravid. RVK/Pandey. the KF man is no fool.

Now to KKR

foreign Players: The three foreign players retained should be

Angelo Mathews – The team can be built around this guy. It would be a straight pick between him and David Hussey, and from the long term perspective, Angelo is a better pick.

Chris Gayle – the bedrock of the team. No questions. It was a straight pick between him and McCullum.

Shane Bond – You have to retain your quick bowler. Although I would understand the rationale if KKR decide to let go of Bond, retain Angelo and McCullum and then try to outbid everyone for someone like Ryan Harris or Kemar Roach or Morne Morkel, for example. However, that is a rare shot. You do not flush out so much money for a player just to see him go after one year. And Bond is a fine, fine player.

Edit: This post was written before Shane Bond’s retirement. Will be sorely missed by all cricket fans. For the context of the piece, however, I’d suggest
Brendan McCullum – Because McCullum can win matches on his own. And is on his day the best T20 player in the world.

(Bidding – The following two player types, should be at the top of the agenda for KKR. I also include the first and second preferences:
A quality spinner – Daniel Vettori / Graeme Swann; because KKR’s biggest problem is the lack of quality spinners. Also, and this might be a little controversial, Vettori would be the best guy to take over from Ganguly in 2012.
A lower order hitter/ finisher – Luke Wright / Roelof Van Der Merwe / Mark Boucher.
Also, try to retain David Hussey and McCullum via bidding. Will be extremely difficult of course…..
A backup quick as foil to Bond might be useful, someone like Ryan Sidebottom (of course only because Stuart Broad seems disinterested in T20) or Juan Theron)

Indian Players: The four Indian players retained

Sourav Ganguly – Because KKR without Ganguly would just not work. Very few outside Bengal understand the concept of Dada and the Bengali psyche. After years of being force-fed by the political powers-that-be of a historical neglect by the center and by the rest of India (I have a lot to say on this, but no further discussion here. I will keep the politics at bay in this blog, email me if you will), Ganguly was the first ray of hope, the first pan-Indian Bengali…. You would not want that guy to go to Pune. And Sahara will bid for him if he is available, mind. And moreover, Shahrukh and his celebrity parade is not really very popular in Kolkata, especially for the undermining of Dada by Buchanan at IPL2. And yes, Kolkata can never not support Dada… what will happen to the Pune vs KKR match at Eden then? Also, KKR is a middling team by IPL standards, and with all teams playing to potential, should be around 6th, giving the semis a shot, but fail eventually. And that’s about the level they reached with Ganguly at the helm in IPL1 and IPL3. IPL2, however…

Manoj Tiwary – A fine player from Bengal. You need a core which understands the pulse of the place, and Tiwary is a fine talent.

Murali Kartik – Kartik is very fine, but KKR always needed more quality spinners. Retaining him is essential, providing him with support even more so.

Jaydev Unadkat – Because Ishant has, after 4 years of International cricket, developed no variations at all, and is a useless T20 bowler at the current state. Unadkat is already better at the T20 format. And maybe moving to Delhi (and playing with Veeru) will give Ishant another shot at improving himself, and that might still be a positive for Indian cricket.

(Bidding –
Kolkata’s problem is that it will not be a heavy bidder like Mumbai, Pune, RCB or Chennai. So the Gambhir / Amit Mishra slot will never be snapped up by them. So it’s about creating a good enough team, picking players from the next level.
Dhawal Kulkarni is a priority. Getting Abhishek Jhunjhunwala back home to Kolkata should be a priority as well. Manpreet Gony if available. Maybe a cheeky bid for Vinay Kumar? I would hate to see that happen, RVK is the quintessential son of the soil. That slot, with one of Saurabh Tiwary / Ambati Rayudu being made available, is attractive. Cheteshwar Pujara is good to keep. He is a real talent, and can do the Ganguly/Kallis job of keeping the innings together very well.)

What will happen:
McCullum. Gayle. Bond. Angelo. Dada. Ishant. Kartik. Agarkar. Alas.


12 thoughts on “IPL 2011 – 4 Indians / 3 Foreigners to be retained: RCB and KKR

  1. Think RVK should be retained simply because RCB have already retained enough batsmen and there are hardly any good young Indian quicks around. KP is good but not good enough for the money he’s being paid. Agree with all the other choices. also concur that Mallya will do the smart thing. He’s learned fast. And by the way you forgot about Nayan Doshi. He’s still unknown and RCB can get him cheaply.

    As for KKR, agree with Mathews and Gayle but not with Bond. Look at his record. He’s way past his best and you never know when he’ll get injured again. Would rather go with David Hussey.

    Agree with the Indian picks also – don’t have much choice do we. If SRK retains Agarkar then god save you 🙂

  2. It’s between RVK and Pandey, and Pandey, in my opinion, is a rare talent. He will play for India in two years’ time… heck, he should play for India now! That’s the quandary. We should retain both, for sure. Similar to Eoin Morgan vs Kallis. If only one can be chosen, I’d say go for Morgan. But in a bidding war, Kallis will cost more… thus, it’s best t put Morgan on the shop window, and not Kallis.

    As for KKR, I included Bond’s name with a caveat. Not picking Bond, is the equivalent of Shahrukh and his bidding team raising their hand to say they have made a mistake. You don’t pay so much money for a player to play for just a season… In all honesty, they have screwed up. But not because of Bond per se, Bond has had a reasonable IPL3. It’s because of the money they paid for him.

  3. The failure of KKR has been in getting the right kind of domestic players….. Bengal is a very successful Ranji trophy team, and the Ranji players should have been used better.
    That’s what Chennai has done, giving locals like Palani Amarnath, Ashwin, Balaji, Ganapathy, Srikkanth Jr, etc a chance, as well as youngsters like Tyagi &c, with definites like Vijay and Badri.
    In Dada, Tiwary, Jhunjhunwala, Ranadeb Bose, Saha, Rohan Gavaskar, LR Shukla, Lahiri and Dinda, along with Karthik and Ishant, even Agarkar and Unadkat, that’s a fine backbone of a team. But Buchanan refused to experiment.

  4. TO,
    EMAIL: syedamira@ymail.com
    MOBILE NO. 0091 8127559439

  5. kolkata knight riders should buy someone like R.Uttapa,Doug Bollinger,Shaun Marsh,Kieron Pollard.Dada should open if the team wants to win because dada is one of the best opener of the world

  6. I know KKR has been having good team. But using the TEAM in right way means (don’t hesitate to drop the players who will not perform up to the team’s confidence level and dont stick on blind ETHICS, use the players according to the conditions of the match)the formula of winning team. Don’t matter which player is having name and fame and which player is not… at international level. At least this time Mr. SRK & Co. please use good quality players in team according to the situations and should win IPL4 TROPHY.

  7. I know KKR has been having good team. But using the TEAM in right way means (don’t hesitate to drop the players who will not perform up to the team’s confidence level and dont stick on blind ETHICS, use the players according to the conditions of the match)the formula of winning team. Don’t matter which player is having name and fame and which player is not… at international level. At least this time Mr. SRK & Co. please use good quality players in team according to the situations and should win IPL4 TROPHY.

  8. Pingback: 2010 in review « Sporting thoughts and otherwise …

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s